Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nataliia's avatar

Thank you for this piece. Your words about “no self to love from” felt like a mirror to something I’ve been slowly arriving at through my own experiences of divorce, loss, rebuilding, and trying to form new relationships.

I want to share a few reflections. They may be a little raw and flowing though.

For a long time I misunderstood unconditional love. I used to think it meant loving someone even if they didn’t choose me back, or letting myself be loved in a way that erased parts of me. Now I see it differently. Unconditional love begins within - not as an egoic act of self-worship, but as the recognition that I am part of the universe, and the universe is within me. From there, choosing another person becomes a conscious act, not a dependency. Real partnership becomes a daily choice, not a reaction to loneliness or fear.

Your father is right about the transits -especially the Venus cycle and the endings marked by the final degrees of Pluto in Pisces and entering Aquarius (when we lose a typical core of understanding the marriage and a family). The Venus period really is about learning to find love within, not outside. And when we connect this understanding of the Universe with psychology and astrology together, everything becomes clearer: the inner world, the outer relationships, the patterns we repeat, the lessons we carry.

After my divorce and my attempts to build something new, I realized that I wasn’t actually choosing partners. I was choosing the parts of myself that were missing. I tried to fill my inner gaps with someone else’s presence. Now I’m slowly rebuilding those inner structures myself, without rushing, without escaping, brick by brick. Because when I restore myself fully and reconnect with my own inner love, the partner who comes will not be an addition to my wounds or a replacement for what I lack, but a conscious choice - someone to walk beside, someone I choose every day, and who chooses me, without running away from responsibility or from the discomfort of growth.

This is also why your reflection about “freedom” resonated so deeply. Many people confuse freedom with avoidance or with constantly searching for new dopamine in new partners. But real freedom is different. It’s the freedom that comes from inner contentment - when you don't need to compensate for the lack inside by chasing novelty. From that place, choosing one person becomes the purest form of freedom, not a limitation.

What you wrote about the disappearance of the lover made sense to me in a very human way. When the “self” stops clinging, love becomes cleaner. Less possessive. Less about fixing or filling anything. More like two whole beings walking side by side, aware that nothing needs to be owned. Maybe that’s what mature partnership is: love that doesn’t come from lack, but from fullness.

And choice itself is also acceptance - a process of becoming whole. A long path of remembering and rebuilding. A journey that, if we are honest, can take more than one lifetime. None of us becomes enlightened in one snap just because we suddenly understand the concept. If it worked like that, we’d all already be Buddhas. It’s a cycle - like moving from the Fool to the World in tarot, completing the whole journey and knowing that at some point it can restart again. Death equals rebirth. Transformation equals continuation.

So for me, the real cosmic joke is this: when I stop searching for someone to complete me, when I restore myself, when my love for myself stops being conditional or dependent, then the right partner will appear - not to fill my emptiness, but to walk with me. Not as the missing piece. But as the conscious choice.

Every day. Quietly. Freely. Without running from commitment.

Two whole universes choosing to walk together - not because they need to, but because they want to.

Expand full comment
Tai's avatar
Nov 16Edited

Another masterpiece in the non dual dhamma diary 🤣.

There is a reminiscing of “there is seeing, but no seer, there is hearing, but no hearer…” etc.

The linguistic sleight of mind that freezes the Verb of everchanging reality into static nouns manipulable by tongue wagging vocalizations and the scrawling of semantics, semiotics and symbols.

But of course, the extension that there is loving but no lover is as profound as it is obvious in the paradoxically non-obvious way that mystery and insight intersect.

Written with gratitude, love and mirth, from nobody to no one. 🤣❤️

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?